ICT as a co-constructive Tool
 |
| VLE discussion forum |
Co-constructive tools support the construction of
some tangible projects by students as a manifestation of their knowledge
construction. Nonetheless, these methods vary from proactive methods in that
students work collaboratively with them to develop a common understanding,
rather than working individually to create some sort of personal knowledge. The
co-constructive tool encourages both the teacher and the students to produce an
efficient result. The usage of collaborative technology in an instructional
sense improves student interaction with the material of the course, enriches
the learning experience, and promotes active involvement through curriculum
development. A co-constructive tool such as Google docs (docs.google.com), electronic whiteboard,
Blogs and wikis, facebook, and discussion forum on portals (pce.edu.bt).
 |
| Google Doc |
Co-constructive resources allowed us involved in the
classroom as we could create a lesson plan as a community via Google Docs. It
was also observed that it was easy for the instructor to determine how many
participants engaged in the exercise or not. Using this application, each
member of a group was given the opportunity to share their views while planning
a lesson plan on any subject. In addition, if one of the members commits
mistakes, the other members can modify them immediately. This was the amazing
experience I had because we didn't know how to do a group activity before and
when. I thought it was going to be taught in the first year so that we could
use this application to discuss any kind of work before. Help individualized
instruction and gives us valuable formative comments that will help improve the
quality of the work. Google Documents lets us develop community tasks, allowing
us to connect and share digitally while improving our learning experience.
On the other side, Google Docs led us to misalign
any perception of a participant. Around the same time, various participants
offer specific views, so we are puzzled about how we will respond so agree on comments. If everybody responds to the topics that concern us, it's hard to
decipher all the details. While we've got a comment list on the right side of
the messages we've all sent at once and we can't make sure our points are in
order. The suggestion I can give in this lesson is Google docs can be appropriate
if we can complete our tasks when all the members are present in the session.
If not through online discussion, the task won’t be that effective as all the
members write at the same time.
 |
Facebook as a co-constructive tool
where peers can give
constructive comments on our work |
Using blog and
Facebook as a co-constructive tool help learners to comment on each other work
for further furnishing of the write-up and works. To use blogs in constructive learning is an online
learning journal in which we reflect on our perceptions of the learning
materials (ICT Tools). To get a clear sense of this, we've commented on ten of
our friend's blogs and commented on how the author learns from the reflections
and builds on the knowledge, often fed and stimulated by comments from other
educational bloggers. In addition,
publishing blogs publicly on the Web can provide a measure of the accuracy of
learning tasks. We noticed that blogging software offers a valuable cognitive
tool by automating the development, editing, and posting of materials, and by
freeing students from the actual task at hand. But we also noticed that adding
a real audience by posting assignments on the web creates authentic discourse,
and forces learners to think more carefully about articulation. We found that
the potential of actual readers, combined with the feedback they received, had
a positive impact on their students' writing skills (reflection). Power of comments: input and constructive analysis
through comments on blog articles may be effective support tools; they offer
direct and comprehensive responses to the suggestions and opinions of the
learner.
 |
| Blog as a co-constructive tool |

Blog as a co-constructive platform where peers exchange opinions about whether the blogger has already released his or her research. Simultaneously, the author reviews the feedback and creates adjustments to his or her writing.